Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
“Ensuring the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows for just a more in depth legal reaction.
Allow’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
six. Mere involvement in the heinous offence is click here no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering that then he is at the rear of the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not serve any effective purpose at this stage.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This could come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development from the concept of estoppel starting while in the High Trees case.
Therefore, it had been held that the right to a healthy environment was part with the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and 14 on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all these types of amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to appreciate with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation usually are not entertainable for your reasons that these kinds of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as a result this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is just not within a position to dilate upon these types of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and identified experts to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.